WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.720 --> 00:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Six roles in thirteen years that went to AFRO Latino

2
00:00:04.480 --> 00:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>leads fifty three thousand characters in a thirteen year period

3
00:00:08.640 --> 00:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and less than five percent of Latinos had speaking parts.

4
00:00:12.080 --> 00:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Like that ain't even close.

5
00:00:13.920 --> 00:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I see as wrong with the awards

6
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is that it's not fun. But also there's no opportunity

7
00:00:20.040 --> 00:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for us to be there.

8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:30.080
<v Speaker 3>From Futro Media and PRX, It's Latino Usa. I'm Marieinojosa

9
00:00:30.480 --> 00:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>today ahead of the Oscars, a look back at a

10
00:00:33.159 --> 00:00:37.160
<v Speaker 3>big year for Latinos in Hollywood and what comes next

11
00:00:37.320 --> 00:00:43.840
<v Speaker 3>for our film community. Why.

12
00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:48.479
<v Speaker 4>From Santamonica, California, the annual Alatama Award.

13
00:00:48.800 --> 00:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It's Hollywood's biggest night.

14
00:00:52.960 --> 00:00:56.120
<v Speaker 4>The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, twenty fifth

15
00:00:56.120 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Annual Academy of forty ninth Annual the Academy Award.

16
00:01:00.680 --> 00:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>From the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in Los Angeles.

17
00:01:03.720 --> 00:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>It's the sixty eighth Annual Academy.

18
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:08.800
<v Speaker 4>This is the seventy second Annual Academy.

19
00:01:08.360 --> 00:01:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Award, also known as the Oscars Live TV.

20
00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:16.640
<v Speaker 5>Here we go, Welcome to the ninety third Oscar.

21
00:01:20.080 --> 00:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>For nearly a century, the Oscars have been considered the

22
00:01:23.520 --> 00:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>most prestigious award in filmmaking, and their influence reaches way

23
00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:32.400
<v Speaker 3>beyond the US. And yet not all is golden at

24
00:01:32.440 --> 00:01:36.679
<v Speaker 3>the Academy Awards. The OSCARS track record with non white,

25
00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:41.200
<v Speaker 3>non male, and international filmmakers has been abysmal.

26
00:01:41.319 --> 00:01:43.840
<v Speaker 6>The popular hashtag is calling out the award show for

27
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:45.440
<v Speaker 6>its lack of diversity. Again.

28
00:01:46.080 --> 00:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>The Oscars So White controversy, which became widespread in twenty sixteen,

29
00:01:50.640 --> 00:01:55.480
<v Speaker 3>encouraged some change and pushed the Academy to diversify its membership.

30
00:01:55.800 --> 00:02:00.800
<v Speaker 6>We want opportunity, what the black actors to get the

31
00:02:00.960 --> 00:02:03.160
<v Speaker 6>same opportune.

32
00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:06.000
<v Speaker 3>But the lack of diversity remains and we're still having

33
00:02:06.160 --> 00:02:10.799
<v Speaker 3>the same conversation. Essentially, the problem isn't just the Oscars.

34
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:14.640
<v Speaker 3>The awards tend to reflect what's happening in mainstream Hollywood,

35
00:02:14.880 --> 00:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's where black and Latino and Latina creators are

36
00:02:18.240 --> 00:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>often shut out. Twenty twenty one, though seemed a little

37
00:02:22.600 --> 00:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>different on paper, it was actually a pretty big year

38
00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>for films featuring Latino and Latinak characters and talent. Popular

39
00:02:31.480 --> 00:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>musicals like Encanto, West Side Story, and In the Heights

40
00:02:35.480 --> 00:02:38.120
<v Speaker 3>come to mind. The first two were nominated for Best

41
00:02:38.200 --> 00:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Animated Film and Best Picture. This year you also have

42
00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>films like Being the Ricardo's, a biopic about Lucille ball

43
00:02:44.919 --> 00:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and Cuban American actor Desiernez, and Nightmare, Ali, Guillermo del

44
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Toro's latest film, which got a Best Picture nod. But

45
00:02:54.080 --> 00:02:58.360
<v Speaker 3>it's worth asking, is this the representation and inclusion of

46
00:02:58.480 --> 00:03:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Latinos and Latinas that we were looking for? And after

47
00:03:03.160 --> 00:03:07.119
<v Speaker 3>nearly a century's worth of exclusion from the biggest awards

48
00:03:07.160 --> 00:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>in the industry, is this enough? So on today's show,

49
00:03:15.120 --> 00:03:17.639
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about, yes, the Oscars, but also

50
00:03:17.840 --> 00:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the state of Latino filmmaking and film criticism. Three Latino

51
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>and Latina film critics join us for the kind of

52
00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:27.480
<v Speaker 3>conversation you're not going to hear in mainstream media ahead

53
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of the Oscars. So go grab your popcorn or in

54
00:03:30.880 --> 00:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>my case, follow meetas and here we go. So, Clayton, Getristina,

55
00:03:40.760 --> 00:03:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and Jack, Welcome to Latino USA.

56
00:03:42.920 --> 00:03:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having us, Thank you for having us, Hi,

57
00:03:44.960 --> 00:03:45.920
<v Speaker 4>thank you for having us.

58
00:03:46.200 --> 00:03:48.440
<v Speaker 3>So let's just go ahead and have you each introduce

59
00:03:48.520 --> 00:03:51.400
<v Speaker 3>yourselves with the little quick one liner of who you are.

60
00:03:51.600 --> 00:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Clayton Davis, I'm the Film Awards editor at Variety.

61
00:03:55.400 --> 00:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Alla, I'm Christina Escovar. I am a freelance journalist and

62
00:03:59.680 --> 00:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>the co founder of Latina Media Puntok.

63
00:04:02.320 --> 00:04:04.760
<v Speaker 6>And I am Jack Rico. I am a filming culture

64
00:04:04.760 --> 00:04:06.520
<v Speaker 6>critic for the last twenty years.

65
00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the Oscars are coming up on March twenty seventh,

66
00:04:10.040 --> 00:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's been a lot of news about what this

67
00:04:12.920 --> 00:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>show is actually going to be like. So you have

68
00:04:15.040 --> 00:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a host, actually three actresses, Amy Schumer, Regina Hall, and

69
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Wanda Sykes. And the ceremony is doing a new thing

70
00:04:22.440 --> 00:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and recognizing a fan favorite film this year, so anyone

71
00:04:26.640 --> 00:04:28.839
<v Speaker 3>can cast a vote for their favorite film of twenty

72
00:04:28.880 --> 00:04:31.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. But I'd like to hear your take on

73
00:04:31.320 --> 00:04:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the nominations, especially the Latinos and Latinas and non white

74
00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>folks who are up for awards. So, Clayton, who should

75
00:04:38.839 --> 00:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I be looking out for in this year's awards?

76
00:04:41.480 --> 00:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>This year, you know, we have Arianna Debos that's carrying

77
00:04:44.480 --> 00:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the torch and Lemonel Miranda is one step closer to

78
00:04:47.960 --> 00:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>egot status because he's nominated for Best Original Song.

79
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Those Sodu Gitas and I.

80
00:04:56.520 --> 00:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And we had our first Latina ever nominated for Best

81
00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Original Score Jermaine Franco. So things are looking up. But

82
00:05:10.200 --> 00:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I am one that always says that Oscars are used

83
00:05:12.640 --> 00:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>as a scapegoat because the real problem is Hollywood. They

84
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can't nominate what's not there, so we continue to move forward.

85
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But it was a better than usual day in Latino

86
00:05:22.440 --> 00:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>world at the Oscars.

87
00:05:23.440 --> 00:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I love that you can't nominate what doesn't exist, Gistina,

88
00:05:27.040 --> 00:05:29.159
<v Speaker 3>what's your quick take on the nominations.

89
00:05:29.800 --> 00:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think we're all going to root for

90
00:05:31.360 --> 00:05:39.479
<v Speaker 4>Adana the Boss. She is indeed the one Whybill, But

91
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>I would also say, you know, we had some great

92
00:05:42.400 --> 00:05:45.320
<v Speaker 4>films this year. We had some amazing outputs. You know,

93
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>we don't see anything for in the Heights. I don't

94
00:05:47.880 --> 00:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>see anything for Passing, which started Latina after Latina and

95
00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Tessa Thompson, and so I feel like we are making

96
00:05:54.680 --> 00:05:58.880
<v Speaker 4>in roads, but it's slower in the quote unquote prestige space,

97
00:05:58.960 --> 00:06:00.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, the Awards space, and I think it is

98
00:06:00.760 --> 00:06:02.960
<v Speaker 4>in other places. And it's slower in film than it

99
00:06:03.000 --> 00:06:06.839
<v Speaker 4>is in television. And that's still on the frustrating side.

100
00:06:07.520 --> 00:06:10.839
<v Speaker 3>Jack, Are you frustrated or are you like? What's your take?

101
00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:14.360
<v Speaker 6>I actually feel that this year in particular, we've actually

102
00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:17.080
<v Speaker 6>made some progress for what everybody else was saying in

103
00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:22.200
<v Speaker 6>terms of you can't really award something that doesn't exist. Well,

104
00:06:22.400 --> 00:06:26.440
<v Speaker 6>this year we actually had a lot of films that

105
00:06:26.480 --> 00:06:28.440
<v Speaker 6>should have been nominated, and I think when you look

106
00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:32.719
<v Speaker 6>at the director's category, in particular, Lady Maniela Miranda, I

107
00:06:32.760 --> 00:06:35.520
<v Speaker 6>thought he did an incredible job with Tik Tak Boom

108
00:06:35.600 --> 00:06:39.600
<v Speaker 6>for his directorial debut. Rinaldo Marcus Green, who did King

109
00:06:39.680 --> 00:06:42.640
<v Speaker 6>Richard nominated for Best Picture, he wasn't nominated for director,

110
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Giermo del Toro Nightmare Aley Best Picture, not nominated for Director.

111
00:06:47.839 --> 00:06:51.479
<v Speaker 6>You have Spencer with Kristin Stewart who was nominated for

112
00:06:51.520 --> 00:06:55.600
<v Speaker 6>Best Actress, but Bablo Lorrain was not nominated, Jennisa Bravo

113
00:06:55.640 --> 00:06:59.960
<v Speaker 6>for Zola. So there was enough there to actually nominate

114
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:04.120
<v Speaker 6>along with supporting actors, et cetera. Yet none of these

115
00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:07.080
<v Speaker 6>people were nominated. And so the question to me is

116
00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:10.480
<v Speaker 6>what do we have to do to get into these

117
00:07:10.640 --> 00:07:14.040
<v Speaker 6>categories where we're usually not even though we put out

118
00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:18.120
<v Speaker 6>great films. If this isn't a good banner year for

119
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:21.840
<v Speaker 6>directors for Latino directors, then what other years are we

120
00:07:21.880 --> 00:07:25.280
<v Speaker 6>going to have? We submit so many great films and

121
00:07:25.320 --> 00:07:26.360
<v Speaker 6>that they're not nominated.

122
00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>There was some controversy shortly after the nominations were announced.

123
00:07:30.920 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Remember that Javier by them press conference.

124
00:07:34.640 --> 00:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Awkward Espanolas one of the person Espanolis.

125
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>So some context. He was nominated for Best Actor for

126
00:07:46.400 --> 00:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>his role in Being the Ricardos, where he played Desi Ernez,

127
00:07:50.400 --> 00:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the famous Cuban American actor. The thing is, Javier, who

128
00:07:54.280 --> 00:07:58.400
<v Speaker 3>is an actor from Spain, chose to speak out about

129
00:07:58.440 --> 00:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the lack of Spanish as in Spain representation in film.

130
00:08:03.960 --> 00:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>He said that Spaniards are actually a minority in Hollywood

131
00:08:07.280 --> 00:08:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and that Latin Americans are represented just fine, but that

132
00:08:09.840 --> 00:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't see Spanish roles anywhere. Caristina, did this get

133
00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>a nerve for you? Were you just okay? It was definitely.

134
00:08:19.520 --> 00:08:23.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that is the wrong approach for him to take,

135
00:08:23.080 --> 00:08:25.160
<v Speaker 4>and for Spanish folks to take as well. I mean,

136
00:08:25.200 --> 00:08:28.480
<v Speaker 4>there's a little thing called colonialism. It operates a lot

137
00:08:28.520 --> 00:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>of our world and controls it. You know, the Spanish

138
00:08:31.480 --> 00:08:34.280
<v Speaker 4>colonized a whole continent and we're still dealing with the

139
00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:37.120
<v Speaker 4>impacts of that, and you see that to this day now,

140
00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not one who thinks that only Chicanos can play

141
00:08:41.040 --> 00:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Mexican Americans on screen. I don't think you see Anglos saying, oh,

142
00:08:44.920 --> 00:08:47.559
<v Speaker 4>you're from Australia, you can't play an American. I think

143
00:08:47.600 --> 00:08:49.880
<v Speaker 4>that is a little bit silly that there should be

144
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:53.480
<v Speaker 4>some flexibility. But there is a big, big difference being

145
00:08:53.720 --> 00:08:58.360
<v Speaker 4>from Europe and being a white person versus being from

146
00:08:58.440 --> 00:09:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Latin America, and they experience and so you get in

147
00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the United States in particular, right, it might be different

148
00:09:04.160 --> 00:09:06.800
<v Speaker 4>actually in Latin America, but when you come to the US,

149
00:09:07.240 --> 00:09:11.000
<v Speaker 4>being a Latino is different than being from Spain, and

150
00:09:11.080 --> 00:09:15.040
<v Speaker 4>there is a different expectation and there are frankly different opportunities.

151
00:09:15.080 --> 00:09:17.440
<v Speaker 4>And so to sort of see him taking up that

152
00:09:17.600 --> 00:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>space and then doubling down on it, to me, showed

153
00:09:21.280 --> 00:09:24.560
<v Speaker 4>a lack of sort of self awareness and also is

154
00:09:24.600 --> 00:09:27.000
<v Speaker 4>frustrating for our community. That's just like trying so hard

155
00:09:27.040 --> 00:09:28.840
<v Speaker 4>to get in the door, to get some of the roles,

156
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:30.040
<v Speaker 4>to tell our own stories.

157
00:09:30.400 --> 00:09:32.920
<v Speaker 6>What were your thoughts, Jack, I think when he uses

158
00:09:32.960 --> 00:09:34.880
<v Speaker 6>the word minority, I think what he really kind of

159
00:09:34.920 --> 00:09:38.160
<v Speaker 6>meant to say was omission. When you look at the

160
00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:41.480
<v Speaker 6>last I don't know ten years of Javier Bordam's career.

161
00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:44.880
<v Speaker 6>He's a Spaniard from Europe who comes to the United

162
00:09:44.920 --> 00:09:48.720
<v Speaker 6>States and has immediately labeled a Latino, and white media

163
00:09:48.760 --> 00:09:51.280
<v Speaker 6>has him like that, and I think that his frustration is,

164
00:09:51.360 --> 00:09:55.920
<v Speaker 6>why aren't we seeing more Spaniard roles in Hollywood? Every

165
00:09:55.920 --> 00:09:58.840
<v Speaker 6>time I go to Hollywood, I'm playing a Latino, whether

166
00:09:58.880 --> 00:10:02.960
<v Speaker 6>it's Pablo escobar Are or Desi Arnez. It's why can't

167
00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:08.360
<v Speaker 6>I play a Spaniard? But in America, Spaniards sort of

168
00:10:08.400 --> 00:10:11.559
<v Speaker 6>become Latinos and they're viewed like that. And I think

169
00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:14.720
<v Speaker 6>his frustration is why are we omitted? But I think

170
00:10:14.840 --> 00:10:17.960
<v Speaker 6>the word minority and the way he framed the whole thing,

171
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:20.960
<v Speaker 6>I think was a misstep on his part and a

172
00:10:21.040 --> 00:10:24.560
<v Speaker 6>rare mystup because he's usually very articulate, but I think

173
00:10:24.600 --> 00:10:25.600
<v Speaker 6>he bombed on this one.

174
00:10:25.679 --> 00:10:26.560
<v Speaker 3>What are your thoughts on that?

175
00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Javier Bardem three of his four Oscar nominated roles

176
00:10:31.120 --> 00:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>were playing Latinos.

177
00:10:32.400 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>There's Desia.

178
00:10:37.679 --> 00:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Before Night Falls, he played a Cuban, you know, Nokuch Froben.

179
00:10:40.920 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>He's playing a Mexican and he's playing a Cuban again

180
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>and being the ricardos.

181
00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

182
00:10:47.000 --> 00:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Ah.

183
00:10:47.480 --> 00:10:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Usually right now, I've been doing the final audience warnut,

184
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I tell you and a Yogato.

185
00:10:52.559 --> 00:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet there have been four Latinos that have been

186
00:10:57.120 --> 00:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>nominated for Best Actor in History ty four years, four

187
00:11:01.440 --> 00:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of them, and we could add a fifth this year

188
00:11:03.640 --> 00:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>if a Latino actually got that role of playing Desi Arnez.

189
00:11:07.240 --> 00:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Like many people when it was announced that Wesize story

190
00:11:09.840 --> 00:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was coming out, my first question was like, why are

191
00:11:12.040 --> 00:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we doing this again? And if it's for the sole

192
00:11:14.240 --> 00:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>reason of getting Ariana Debos and Rachel Zegler in our lives,

193
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>then I'll take it. But the truth is that dot

194
00:11:21.640 --> 00:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>On Wood win, Ariana de bos wins the Oscar. She's

195
00:11:24.600 --> 00:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be the second Latina to ever win an

196
00:11:29.040 --> 00:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>acting Oscar. The second and the first was Rito Moreno

197
00:11:32.240 --> 00:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>playing the same role. So we are not seeing the

198
00:11:36.360 --> 00:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>progress in this space. And to say that there are

199
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>roles for Latinos, sure, they're usually gang members and janitors.

200
00:11:45.440 --> 00:11:48.719
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmmmm, All right, Jack, can you just chime in

201
00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>and YouTube Christina? What makes a film a Latin or

202
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Latina film? Obviously, all we do on this program is

203
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about the complexity of this community. So on the

204
00:11:59.320 --> 00:12:01.840
<v Speaker 3>issue of film, what is it? Because it does begin

205
00:12:01.880 --> 00:12:04.079
<v Speaker 3>to feel a little boxed in.

206
00:12:04.600 --> 00:12:08.200
<v Speaker 6>Things are so complicated and weird now in terms of

207
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:11.320
<v Speaker 6>the regulations and the policies in the Academy. For example,

208
00:12:11.360 --> 00:12:14.000
<v Speaker 6>Memoria till the Swinton was in it, but it took

209
00:12:14.080 --> 00:12:16.400
<v Speaker 6>place in Colombia? Was that a Colombian film? Was that

210
00:12:16.440 --> 00:12:20.960
<v Speaker 6>a European film? So I think that the basic fundamental

211
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:23.720
<v Speaker 6>of what a Latino movie is is if it has

212
00:12:23.840 --> 00:12:28.319
<v Speaker 6>a Latino themed story with Latino actors. Does the director,

213
00:12:28.720 --> 00:12:30.560
<v Speaker 6>like for example, John Chewing in The Heights, does he

214
00:12:30.640 --> 00:12:32.719
<v Speaker 6>need to be Latino for that film to be a

215
00:12:32.800 --> 00:12:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Latino movie. For the most part, most journalists, most Latin critics,

216
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:39.000
<v Speaker 6>when they look at a movie like In the Heights,

217
00:12:39.040 --> 00:12:42.120
<v Speaker 6>we call that a Latino film. When you talk about

218
00:12:42.160 --> 00:12:45.679
<v Speaker 6>West Side Story, to me, as a Latino critic, I

219
00:12:45.720 --> 00:12:48.560
<v Speaker 6>see that as a Latino film because the majority of

220
00:12:48.640 --> 00:12:53.000
<v Speaker 6>the emphasis and the focus was on the Puerto Ricans

221
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:54.079
<v Speaker 6>in this particular film.

222
00:12:54.080 --> 00:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So I would call that a Latino film.

223
00:12:56.040 --> 00:13:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Get your shoes on, I want to dance. I'll just

224
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:05.200
<v Speaker 3>be straight up. I mean Steven Spielberg and he's directed

225
00:13:05.240 --> 00:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously phenomenal films, but there was a part of me

226
00:13:07.800 --> 00:13:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that was like, Okay, why Stephen, though, is your sense

227
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>that then West Side Story is a Latino film or not?

228
00:13:16.840 --> 00:13:19.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that one's tricky. I think we have to

229
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:23.199
<v Speaker 4>take it as one of ours because of the amazing

230
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:26.320
<v Speaker 4>performances that the Latinas and Latinos put in on that film,

231
00:13:26.360 --> 00:13:28.320
<v Speaker 4>and we have to celebrate them and shot them out

232
00:13:28.360 --> 00:13:30.840
<v Speaker 4>and scream from the rooftops about how great they did,

233
00:13:30.920 --> 00:13:33.800
<v Speaker 4>because we don't want to be only able to work

234
00:13:33.840 --> 00:13:36.520
<v Speaker 4>with Latino creatives. But we also need to say really

235
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:41.360
<v Speaker 4>clearly that it is not enough that West Side Story

236
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:44.640
<v Speaker 4>is very limited. It's very limited in its portrayal of

237
00:13:44.679 --> 00:13:47.960
<v Speaker 4>our community. It's limited. They did the best that some

238
00:13:48.040 --> 00:13:50.800
<v Speaker 4>white guys can do, but they couldn't bridge the gap

239
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:54.280
<v Speaker 4>and make it meaningful and advance I think the representation

240
00:13:54.400 --> 00:13:57.280
<v Speaker 4>of our community outside of giving the platform over to

241
00:13:57.320 --> 00:14:01.640
<v Speaker 4>some amazing actors. So is it a Latino film? I

242
00:14:01.679 --> 00:14:04.600
<v Speaker 4>guess so, But it's not the ones that we're looking for, right.

243
00:14:04.640 --> 00:14:06.520
<v Speaker 4>We want to be the ones who are behind the camera,

244
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:10.360
<v Speaker 4>who are writing the stories, who are directing, and who

245
00:14:10.360 --> 00:14:13.120
<v Speaker 4>are really shaping it from start to finish, not sort

246
00:14:13.120 --> 00:14:17.920
<v Speaker 4>of rehashing old pieces and being subsumed into this larger

247
00:14:18.200 --> 00:14:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Anglo narrative that sees us in these very limited ways

248
00:14:22.080 --> 00:14:25.800
<v Speaker 4>as violent or maybe sex objects.

249
00:14:27.720 --> 00:14:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on Latino USA, we continue to break down

250
00:14:30.440 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 3>the past year in Latino movies and we asked the

251
00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:40.160
<v Speaker 3>big question, do the oscars really even matter? Stay with us?

252
00:14:40.600 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Why?

253
00:14:40.840 --> 00:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Hey, we're back. I've been talking with film critics

254
00:15:27.640 --> 00:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and journalists Clayton Davis, Jack Rico, and Christina Escobard about

255
00:15:32.800 --> 00:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the oscars and Latino films that came out last year.

256
00:15:36.240 --> 00:15:38.760
<v Speaker 3>We're going to keep that conversation going now and talk

257
00:15:38.760 --> 00:15:43.480
<v Speaker 3>about how we build the future of Latino filmmaking. One

258
00:15:43.520 --> 00:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>of the things that we have seen this year is

259
00:15:45.840 --> 00:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of the Latino Latino films are big musicals.

260
00:15:50.360 --> 00:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Oftentimes they're about family. We're getting young kids who are

261
00:15:53.360 --> 00:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>speaking Spanglish and you know Abuelita for example in Encanto

262
00:15:57.760 --> 00:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>featuring a Colombian family voice by LATINX actors, nominated for

263
00:16:02.600 --> 00:16:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Best Animated Feature, and Kanta was a big commercial hit.

264
00:16:09.680 --> 00:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>The song we Don't Talk About Bruno topped the Billboard

265
00:16:13.000 --> 00:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>chart for weeks and has become more popular than let

266
00:16:16.240 --> 00:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>It Go from Frozen. All Right, so there is LATINX

267
00:16:20.160 --> 00:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>representation on screen right, But at the same time, is

268
00:16:23.360 --> 00:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>this what we really want? And so I'm wondering what

269
00:16:26.520 --> 00:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the quote unquote right kind of representation is. Do you

270
00:16:30.960 --> 00:16:34.280
<v Speaker 3>think that something's missing here? And by the way, I

271
00:16:34.360 --> 00:16:37.680
<v Speaker 3>love these films, but there is an element still of cliche,

272
00:16:38.280 --> 00:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and I'm wondering if you feel the same way, Jack, Absolutely.

273
00:16:41.800 --> 00:16:43.680
<v Speaker 6>I think what we need now is we need to

274
00:16:43.720 --> 00:16:49.240
<v Speaker 6>start developing talent, more LATINX talent, writers, directors, producers, people

275
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:51.640
<v Speaker 6>who are on the pulse of what's happening in the

276
00:16:51.760 --> 00:16:54.480
<v Speaker 6>United States with the Latino community. For example, I've been

277
00:16:54.480 --> 00:16:58.880
<v Speaker 6>waiting for the Roberto Clemente biopic for decades ready. Why

278
00:16:59.000 --> 00:17:00.240
<v Speaker 6>hasn't that been done.

279
00:17:00.320 --> 00:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Because Javi ar Barden isn't available.

280
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Touche, Yeah, you'll play the Puerto Rican, you in to

281
00:17:08.840 --> 00:17:12.639
<v Speaker 6>the Puerto Rican, You'll play everybody. It just needs to

282
00:17:12.640 --> 00:17:15.000
<v Speaker 6>come to a point that we need to start telling

283
00:17:15.200 --> 00:17:19.000
<v Speaker 6>authentic stories about our own lives within the United States,

284
00:17:19.119 --> 00:17:22.359
<v Speaker 6>within Latin America and the relationship that we have with

285
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the world. What our frustrations, our struggles, our joys, our celebrations.

286
00:17:29.119 --> 00:17:32.000
<v Speaker 6>These stories need to be told. But there seems to

287
00:17:32.040 --> 00:17:36.880
<v Speaker 6>be a challenge with the gatekeepers that we're not hot enough,

288
00:17:37.000 --> 00:17:40.520
<v Speaker 6>we don't have enough superstars to package deals. I don't

289
00:17:40.560 --> 00:17:44.240
<v Speaker 6>even know if we still have a legitimate A list actor,

290
00:17:44.320 --> 00:17:48.080
<v Speaker 6>a La Tom Cruise that is Latino. And that's the problem.

291
00:17:48.280 --> 00:17:51.760
<v Speaker 6>And unless we get to these places, to this hierarchy,

292
00:17:51.800 --> 00:17:55.399
<v Speaker 6>to this tier, we're gonna maintain sort of the status

293
00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:56.520
<v Speaker 6>quo what we have right now.

294
00:17:56.800 --> 00:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I agree with the talent is out there, but it's

295
00:17:59.280 --> 00:18:01.879
<v Speaker 3>like getting through the door. So there's a frustration on

296
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that element too, right.

297
00:18:03.400 --> 00:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's getting through the door. But there is also

298
00:18:06.600 --> 00:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>again the Hollywood idea of what a Latino or LATINX

299
00:18:10.359 --> 00:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>person is for women, especially like unless you're Jennifer Lopez

300
00:18:14.280 --> 00:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>or Sophia Vigara, like that's latinas to Hollywood only. And

301
00:18:18.960 --> 00:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I remember having this argument with someone during Roma about

302
00:18:22.600 --> 00:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Julita Padiicio, and I was like, I've seen her more

303
00:18:26.880 --> 00:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in my life than i've seen j Lo's and you're

304
00:18:29.720 --> 00:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to generalize five hundred million people and you can't

305
00:18:32.840 --> 00:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do that. So again, you have to expand your way

306
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. And then also, and I'll put this out there,

307
00:18:39.600 --> 00:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Latinos have to write their own house too. Because I'll

308
00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>never be able to have an articulate conversation really on

309
00:18:47.720 --> 00:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>social media when I bring up something like latinos are

310
00:18:51.200 --> 00:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>not seen, and then I look at the thread and

311
00:18:54.480 --> 00:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>there's like five hundred comments about LATINX and that's what

312
00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they're arguing about about, Like why are you on this LATINX?

313
00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, we're not on TV or movies, but

314
00:19:04.119 --> 00:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to argue about this LATINX term like die

315
00:19:06.640 --> 00:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>on that hill? And we have a colorism problem. We

316
00:19:09.240 --> 00:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of issues within our own community that

317
00:19:11.480 --> 00:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we have to address also. And that's why there's not

318
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>being progress because if I was a white producer, I

319
00:19:17.280 --> 00:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>would look and say, oh, they're arguing over there. I'll

320
00:19:19.600 --> 00:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>keep just doing my thing while they keep arguing over

321
00:19:23.520 --> 00:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a letter in the alphabet. So that's what's going to

322
00:19:26.520 --> 00:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>keep happening.

323
00:19:27.600 --> 00:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>So, Christina, your whole life is basically dedicated to advancing

324
00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:36.880
<v Speaker 3>this conversation. So how do we advance the conversation beyond representation?

325
00:19:37.080 --> 00:19:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Because I've been having this conversation for years, right, how

326
00:19:42.040 --> 00:19:46.119
<v Speaker 3>do you think about advancing this conversation critically in a

327
00:19:46.160 --> 00:19:49.880
<v Speaker 3>more profound way that goes beyond this quote unquote representation.

328
00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have to work on multiple levels. Right. Hollywood

329
00:19:54.080 --> 00:19:56.640
<v Speaker 4>is a complex system in and of itself, and it's

330
00:19:56.640 --> 00:20:00.639
<v Speaker 4>an even more complex ecosystem when you think about the

331
00:20:00.680 --> 00:20:03.959
<v Speaker 4>studios and the distribution and the critical analysis and all

332
00:20:04.000 --> 00:20:06.159
<v Speaker 4>of that piece. So we need to work on building

333
00:20:07.040 --> 00:20:10.560
<v Speaker 4>in front of behind the camera as cultural gatekeepers all

334
00:20:10.600 --> 00:20:12.879
<v Speaker 4>of that stuff. And part of what we need to

335
00:20:12.880 --> 00:20:16.160
<v Speaker 4>do as Latinos and latinx Is and our community. Pert

336
00:20:16.200 --> 00:20:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Clayton's point, I couldn't agree with it more is organize

337
00:20:19.359 --> 00:20:22.680
<v Speaker 4>our own house so that we can see each other

338
00:20:23.040 --> 00:20:27.040
<v Speaker 4>and be excited about each other and recognize a unity

339
00:20:27.040 --> 00:20:31.080
<v Speaker 4>in ourselves to say we are not perfect, we are

340
00:20:31.119 --> 00:20:35.160
<v Speaker 4>not equal. We have problems, yes, but we are going

341
00:20:35.200 --> 00:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to see that there is a strength in it being

342
00:20:37.920 --> 00:20:40.359
<v Speaker 4>together in a group. There's a political strength in it,

343
00:20:40.400 --> 00:20:42.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a market share strength in it, and we're going

344
00:20:42.920 --> 00:20:46.200
<v Speaker 4>to use that to get what we want. But that's

345
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:48.240
<v Speaker 4>not going to work if we're saying, oh, actually, black

346
00:20:48.280 --> 00:20:50.920
<v Speaker 4>folks aren't part of our community. There are no black Mexicans,

347
00:20:50.920 --> 00:20:54.080
<v Speaker 4>there are no Asian Latinos there, we don't really have

348
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:56.480
<v Speaker 4>queer people like. None of that will help us. That

349
00:20:56.520 --> 00:20:58.480
<v Speaker 4>will just further divide us. So we need to figure

350
00:20:58.480 --> 00:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>out how to address some of those issues. And then

351
00:21:01.080 --> 00:21:03.400
<v Speaker 4>we also need to build our own houses. Like if

352
00:21:03.400 --> 00:21:05.920
<v Speaker 4>we're sitting there waiting for Hollywood to call on us

353
00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:09.720
<v Speaker 4>or whatever industry, that's never going to happen. So we

354
00:21:09.840 --> 00:21:13.720
<v Speaker 4>need to be building our own institutions and our own

355
00:21:13.800 --> 00:21:17.600
<v Speaker 4>pathways and using those to build up ourselves while also

356
00:21:17.720 --> 00:21:21.680
<v Speaker 4>pushing on the power structures that exist to push for change.

357
00:21:22.240 --> 00:21:24.399
<v Speaker 3>All right, We're going to turn the cameras now onto

358
00:21:24.480 --> 00:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>you and talk about your field. And you know, people

359
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:31.360
<v Speaker 3>love to hate film critics, but I'd like to dig

360
00:21:31.400 --> 00:21:34.120
<v Speaker 3>into your roles and really understand why is it important

361
00:21:34.119 --> 00:21:37.040
<v Speaker 3>for us to have critics who are LATINX, who are

362
00:21:37.080 --> 00:21:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Afro Latino, who are black, And how can you use

363
00:21:40.640 --> 00:21:43.639
<v Speaker 3>the platforms that you work on to advance the conversation

364
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:47.600
<v Speaker 3>about inclusion in Hollywood. And let's start with you, Clayton.

365
00:21:48.240 --> 00:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>It's all around representation and entertainment. A film like In

366
00:21:53.200 --> 00:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Heights in particular. You know, In the Heights wasn't

367
00:22:01.760 --> 00:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite film of the year, but I cried during

368
00:22:03.920 --> 00:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing because it was my first time coming

369
00:22:06.520 --> 00:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>back to a movie theater and I was there watching

370
00:22:09.800 --> 00:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a piece of me on screen that I don't get

371
00:22:12.240 --> 00:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to see very often. But I looked around and there

372
00:22:16.280 --> 00:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>were very little journalists that looked like me that shared

373
00:22:19.920 --> 00:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that same space. It was critically acclaimed, It did so

374
00:22:23.160 --> 00:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>well critically, but I remember reading through so many of

375
00:22:26.920 --> 00:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the reviews and.

376
00:22:28.160 --> 00:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>It was just.

377
00:22:30.520 --> 00:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of like, I want to say,

378
00:22:32.160 --> 00:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>basic takes. But I was waiting to read the part

379
00:22:36.760 --> 00:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where Abuela has like, I don't know, babiyah boiling like

380
00:22:42.080 --> 00:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on her stove. I was waiting to see eating rice

381
00:22:45.080 --> 00:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and beans at the table. Just these little nuances that

382
00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are us. There's so few Christina Escobars and Jack Rico's

383
00:22:55.560 --> 00:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. There is just us. So we have

384
00:22:58.640 --> 00:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to have each other's backs or who else is going

385
00:23:01.960 --> 00:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to And that's the next big thing that needs to change.

386
00:23:05.760 --> 00:23:05.960
<v Speaker 4>You know.

387
00:23:06.080 --> 00:23:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Jack Clayton just brought up In the Heights. Of course,

388
00:23:08.160 --> 00:23:10.040
<v Speaker 3>as you know, I'm a little partial because I had

389
00:23:10.080 --> 00:23:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a role in In the Heights, and I do feel

390
00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:17.320
<v Speaker 3>like In the Heights was entirely snubbed, shut out, even

391
00:23:17.359 --> 00:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>though there was legit criticism. But I do feel like,

392
00:23:21.240 --> 00:23:24.840
<v Speaker 3>as you said, Clayton, there were people crying throughout the

393
00:23:25.000 --> 00:23:29.680
<v Speaker 3>entire film, and I'm wondering Jack Visa viv the conversation

394
00:23:29.840 --> 00:23:33.680
<v Speaker 3>of Latino and Latina film critics. How you see how

395
00:23:33.720 --> 00:23:36.840
<v Speaker 3>that played out. I love that there's a sense of community,

396
00:23:37.040 --> 00:23:39.120
<v Speaker 3>but there's also a tremendous amount of pressure on you.

397
00:23:39.560 --> 00:23:42.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, the first thing is actually Clayton created the Latino

398
00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Entertainment Journalist Association, which is probably the only right I

399
00:23:46.880 --> 00:23:52.520
<v Speaker 6>love that Latino Film Critics organization where Latino film critics

400
00:23:52.520 --> 00:23:54.560
<v Speaker 6>can go. But you know, part of the problems is

401
00:23:55.320 --> 00:23:57.359
<v Speaker 6>we're not all working for the New York Times or

402
00:23:57.400 --> 00:24:00.800
<v Speaker 6>the Washington Post. We're independent, and so scale is a

403
00:24:00.880 --> 00:24:05.080
<v Speaker 6>massive problem with Latino LATINX film critics. We don't have

404
00:24:05.160 --> 00:24:08.200
<v Speaker 6>the mass audience to be able to talk about a

405
00:24:08.280 --> 00:24:11.800
<v Speaker 6>Latino film and have that go viral or national or

406
00:24:11.840 --> 00:24:15.240
<v Speaker 6>be shared by the elite, by the influencers who actually

407
00:24:15.440 --> 00:24:19.240
<v Speaker 6>change rules and laws depending on what we say. I

408
00:24:19.240 --> 00:24:21.720
<v Speaker 6>think the other second challenge about Latino critics is that

409
00:24:22.200 --> 00:24:24.879
<v Speaker 6>sometimes we just don't want to criticize our films because

410
00:24:25.160 --> 00:24:28.400
<v Speaker 6>we're barely getting any promotion. And if you have Latino critics,

411
00:24:28.520 --> 00:24:31.119
<v Speaker 6>bash a couple of Latino films that are key, for example,

412
00:24:31.160 --> 00:24:33.680
<v Speaker 6>like even in the Heights or West Side story. Then

413
00:24:35.080 --> 00:24:38.760
<v Speaker 6>the support for that then dies because an executive in

414
00:24:38.800 --> 00:24:43.359
<v Speaker 6>Hollywood says, see, even Latino critics are bashing their own movies.

415
00:24:43.440 --> 00:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Which, by the way, is the most racist thing. I

416
00:24:45.520 --> 00:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think this is the thing that drives me nuts all

417
00:24:47.680 --> 00:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the time when I get pictures and they're like, but

418
00:24:49.760 --> 00:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're Latino, and like it's literally the argument, like, we

419
00:24:54.040 --> 00:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to like just one thing, you know, we

420
00:24:56.960 --> 00:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like other things, and we also need to stop putting

421
00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>all the weight of our culture on women. Well, Miranda's

422
00:25:04.240 --> 00:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>shoulders to represent for everyone. I thought he gave the

423
00:25:08.480 --> 00:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>best response in the Heights the colorism debate, where he

424
00:25:11.840 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, listen, I will try better next time. I

425
00:25:14.000 --> 00:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>can't expect him to get all of us in one go.

426
00:25:16.800 --> 00:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>There's like, again, five hundred million of us, Like come on.

427
00:25:20.119 --> 00:25:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Gristina, Well I would add that.

428
00:25:23.600 --> 00:25:25.840
<v Speaker 4>So we at Latina Media Co. We do a lot

429
00:25:25.840 --> 00:25:28.840
<v Speaker 4>of work on helping Latinas, in particular because women are

430
00:25:28.840 --> 00:25:32.280
<v Speaker 4>even more underrepresented, speak out and share their voice, and

431
00:25:32.359 --> 00:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>that feels amazing and I love doing that. But I

432
00:25:34.960 --> 00:25:38.520
<v Speaker 4>also want to say, the whole industry is a mess,

433
00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:42.240
<v Speaker 4>and the folks that I look at who've made it,

434
00:25:42.280 --> 00:25:46.240
<v Speaker 4>who are editors at big publications or who get great jobs,

435
00:25:46.800 --> 00:25:49.520
<v Speaker 4>then they're one layoff away. I've seen them rise up,

436
00:25:49.600 --> 00:25:52.479
<v Speaker 4>do amazing stuff for years, get acclaim, and then they

437
00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:54.879
<v Speaker 4>get laid off. There's a part of me that feels like,

438
00:25:55.160 --> 00:25:58.159
<v Speaker 4>am I encouraging Latinas to go into an industry that

439
00:25:58.359 --> 00:26:00.560
<v Speaker 4>is not going to respect them, it's not going to

440
00:26:00.640 --> 00:26:02.480
<v Speaker 4>value them, that's going to be the first to lay

441
00:26:02.520 --> 00:26:04.840
<v Speaker 4>them off, no matter how good they do, no matter

442
00:26:04.840 --> 00:26:09.320
<v Speaker 4>what audience they build. And that is a problem that

443
00:26:09.480 --> 00:26:11.920
<v Speaker 4>is in many ways bigger than us. But we need

444
00:26:11.960 --> 00:26:16.400
<v Speaker 4>to build different systems because this one isn't working. It's

445
00:26:16.400 --> 00:26:19.120
<v Speaker 4>not working for Latinos, but it's not working in general

446
00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:24.600
<v Speaker 4>in terms of getting meaningful, strong criticism out there and

447
00:26:24.720 --> 00:26:27.880
<v Speaker 4>elevated from a variety of different voices.

448
00:26:28.560 --> 00:26:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really frustrating, especially when you think about the

449
00:26:32.040 --> 00:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>kinds of stories that exist in our communities across the board.

450
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, Latinos and Latinas we consume one out of

451
00:26:40.080 --> 00:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>every four movie tickets. Oh my god, when movie tickets

452
00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:46.119
<v Speaker 3>were sold. But you know, we're a quarter of the

453
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:51.160
<v Speaker 3>movie going audience and we're getting older, and that means

454
00:26:51.200 --> 00:26:54.160
<v Speaker 3>that there's another generation of younger people who are developing

455
00:26:54.200 --> 00:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>their own desires and tastes visa v. Hollywood and film.

456
00:26:58.080 --> 00:27:00.840
<v Speaker 3>So I was speaking with another young latin and she

457
00:27:01.000 --> 00:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was like, Uh, you know, it's an Aaron Sorkin film.

458
00:27:04.240 --> 00:27:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna go see that, or look, Steven Spielberg great,

459
00:27:08.119 --> 00:27:10.280
<v Speaker 3>but West Side Story, I'm not so sure. So it

460
00:27:10.320 --> 00:27:14.480
<v Speaker 3>feels like there's this tension where you have a generation

461
00:27:14.840 --> 00:27:18.960
<v Speaker 3>of younger Latinos and Latinas they're not actually watching what

462
00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:23.679
<v Speaker 3>the Oscars are doing. They're kind of losing interest. Clayton,

463
00:27:23.720 --> 00:27:25.719
<v Speaker 3>let's start with you. What does that mean for the

464
00:27:25.760 --> 00:27:31.159
<v Speaker 3>future of Hollywood If Latinos are essentially like, You're not

465
00:27:31.560 --> 00:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>valuable and I'm not turning to you to give me

466
00:27:34.800 --> 00:27:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the props that I need.

467
00:27:36.560 --> 00:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Oscars not being watched is I think it's

468
00:27:41.560 --> 00:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more complex, maybe not even complex. I would say even

469
00:27:43.960 --> 00:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more simplistic than Latino's not seeing themselves there, which is

470
00:27:49.640 --> 00:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a part of it, but it also is The Oscars

471
00:27:53.840 --> 00:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and all awards shows the need to revamp the way

472
00:27:56.920 --> 00:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>awards are delivered. Last year was a prime example, was

473
00:28:00.800 --> 00:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a very bad ceremony, devoid of fun, or film clips.

474
00:28:05.880 --> 00:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you're going to celebrate film, truly celebrate film.

475
00:28:11.119 --> 00:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think when you add in the parts of

476
00:28:15.680 --> 00:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Latinos not being there as well, or just people of

477
00:28:18.880 --> 00:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>color in general, then it only further pushes that narrative.

478
00:28:24.320 --> 00:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>John leg Was almost said this best. I interviewed him

479
00:28:26.320 --> 00:28:28.239
<v Speaker 1>one time. He said, I'm not even asking for more,

480
00:28:28.280 --> 00:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking for what's mine. So if we're twenty five

481
00:28:30.560 --> 00:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of the buying power in America, then twenty five

482
00:28:33.720 --> 00:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>percent of the movies needs to have us in it.

483
00:28:35.480 --> 00:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And then if we're not there, then I could be like,

484
00:28:37.119 --> 00:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't make it, but we're not.

485
00:28:39.520 --> 00:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>It feels like when Latinos and Latinas kind of raise

486
00:28:43.200 --> 00:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>their hands and are kind of saying the things we

487
00:28:46.160 --> 00:28:49.840
<v Speaker 3>come with the data the responses often can you all

488
00:28:49.960 --> 00:28:55.440
<v Speaker 3>just relax? What's the matter with you? You feel that, Christina?

489
00:28:55.640 --> 00:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I do.

490
00:28:56.440 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that the Oscars, the award shows, they do

491
00:29:00.200 --> 00:29:03.320
<v Speaker 4>make a difference in terms of they still shape what

492
00:29:03.440 --> 00:29:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood makes, what Hollywood considers quote unquote good, and so

493
00:29:07.600 --> 00:29:10.480
<v Speaker 4>there is still a significance to them. Listen, it's not

494
00:29:10.680 --> 00:29:13.160
<v Speaker 4>cheap to make a movie. It's certainly not one like

495
00:29:13.200 --> 00:29:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Westside Story or to make a TV show. They're expensive,

496
00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:20.720
<v Speaker 4>and Hollywood is a business, and I think we've proven

497
00:29:20.840 --> 00:29:24.520
<v Speaker 4>many a time over that we can make money. But

498
00:29:24.640 --> 00:29:27.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not so much to me about that as it

499
00:29:27.320 --> 00:29:30.880
<v Speaker 4>is about we just need so much more, right, We

500
00:29:30.920 --> 00:29:33.560
<v Speaker 4>need so many more depictions, so many more options. Part

501
00:29:33.560 --> 00:29:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Clayton's point. If we want to win these awards, and

502
00:29:36.080 --> 00:29:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I think we do want to win them, I think

503
00:29:37.560 --> 00:29:40.920
<v Speaker 4>it's worth hollering about and advocating for, but it's certainly

504
00:29:40.920 --> 00:29:43.880
<v Speaker 4>also not the only thing that we should be working

505
00:29:43.920 --> 00:29:47.160
<v Speaker 4>on in Hollywood, or entertainment, or representation either. The awards

506
00:29:47.200 --> 00:29:49.920
<v Speaker 4>are a part of the ecosystem, but it's not the

507
00:29:50.000 --> 00:29:53.440
<v Speaker 4>only part, and they're not even the only part of criticism.

508
00:29:54.160 --> 00:29:57.000
<v Speaker 4>You look at who are critics, and they're still overwhelmingly

509
00:29:57.120 --> 00:30:00.520
<v Speaker 4>white and male, and that sets a limited view for

510
00:30:00.600 --> 00:30:04.440
<v Speaker 4>what is considered good that isn't reflective of the viewing

511
00:30:04.520 --> 00:30:07.520
<v Speaker 4>populace or the world. And it also leads, I would say,

512
00:30:07.520 --> 00:30:09.520
<v Speaker 4>to more boring art. You just sort of see the

513
00:30:09.520 --> 00:30:12.400
<v Speaker 4>same stuff over and over again, and instead of seeing

514
00:30:12.400 --> 00:30:14.720
<v Speaker 4>the whole sort of breadth and depth and beauty of

515
00:30:14.800 --> 00:30:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the world and all the different perspectives including Latinos obviously, right.

516
00:30:19.160 --> 00:30:22.480
<v Speaker 3>So if not the Oscars, where do we churn for

517
00:30:23.280 --> 00:30:27.000
<v Speaker 3>excellence in Latinos and Latinas. We want to be celebrated.

518
00:30:27.040 --> 00:30:29.600
<v Speaker 3>We want to have those awards statements next to our

519
00:30:29.640 --> 00:30:33.720
<v Speaker 3>big billboards. If not the Oscars, then to war take

520
00:30:33.800 --> 00:30:34.440
<v Speaker 3>us out, Clayton.

521
00:30:34.880 --> 00:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, that's why we need the Oscars there,

522
00:30:37.560 --> 00:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like whether we like it or not, they are the

523
00:30:40.920 --> 00:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>pinnacle of what is deemed success in this business. Now

524
00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that like it should be that way, but they

525
00:30:49.280 --> 00:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do offer something to strive for in this business. And

526
00:30:53.800 --> 00:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>why I believe the Oscars are important I never want

527
00:30:57.480 --> 00:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to see them go away, is because they have always

528
00:31:01.440 --> 00:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>provided a relevant cultural snapshot of a cinematic year. There

529
00:31:06.600 --> 00:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is no reason for me to ever know the movie

530
00:31:09.600 --> 00:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>How Green was My Valley other than it's the film

531
00:31:13.520 --> 00:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that beats Citizen Kane at the Oscars. But also they

532
00:31:16.800 --> 00:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>reflect the mindset of the country at a time. How

533
00:31:20.280 --> 00:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Green Was My Valley beat Citizen Kane because Pearl Harbor

534
00:31:24.040 --> 00:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was bombed like two months before the Oscars and everyone

535
00:31:26.560 --> 00:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>got into a real pro America mood. Those are things

536
00:31:30.080 --> 00:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're able to learn and reflect on. And if

537
00:31:34.080 --> 00:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the Oscars to kind of do that

538
00:31:36.400 --> 00:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in that cinematic form. That's how films get lost, That's

539
00:31:39.720 --> 00:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how we don't discover cinema over the years. So why

540
00:31:43.520 --> 00:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Parasite now lives in the eons or a Roma again

541
00:31:48.040 --> 00:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lives in our soul because it was nearly there but

542
00:31:51.960 --> 00:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it just missed. And there's an argument that like Moonlight

543
00:31:54.560 --> 00:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>wins Best Picture because Trump won the presidency and there

544
00:31:57.600 --> 00:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was a way to give the middle finger. You know,

545
00:31:59.360 --> 00:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the that we need and will always need

546
00:32:02.080 --> 00:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and I never want to lose that.

547
00:32:04.920 --> 00:32:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Jack, where do we turn if not the Oscars?

548
00:32:07.800 --> 00:32:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, Latino USA will probably have a movie review podcast

549
00:32:10.840 --> 00:32:19.200
<v Speaker 6>where starring Latino critics. But I think I agree with

550
00:32:19.320 --> 00:32:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Clayton because the thing about the Oscars from its inception,

551
00:32:23.640 --> 00:32:26.760
<v Speaker 6>it was always meant to promote movies after they leave

552
00:32:26.800 --> 00:32:29.680
<v Speaker 6>the theaters, to give it a new run, to make

553
00:32:29.800 --> 00:32:31.920
<v Speaker 6>money and revenue off of it. And it's always been

554
00:32:31.960 --> 00:32:36.720
<v Speaker 6>a promotional platform and what we use the Oscars for

555
00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:43.640
<v Speaker 6>it still is a cultural shaper of society. People get

556
00:32:43.680 --> 00:32:47.240
<v Speaker 6>to be stars if they're nominated. What happened to Jalita

557
00:32:47.280 --> 00:32:49.880
<v Speaker 6>Barricio is one of the most phenomenal things of this

558
00:32:50.000 --> 00:32:55.080
<v Speaker 6>decade because she's Indigenous and we never really had an

559
00:32:55.120 --> 00:32:57.280
<v Speaker 6>actress like that, and that was because of the Oscars.

560
00:32:57.280 --> 00:33:01.120
<v Speaker 6>So it still manages to reach a global audience and

561
00:33:01.200 --> 00:33:04.880
<v Speaker 6>to change careers and to give Latino films that have

562
00:33:05.080 --> 00:33:09.040
<v Speaker 6>not before been discovered a platform for them to be

563
00:33:09.120 --> 00:33:12.080
<v Speaker 6>discovered and change the lives of those creators and the

564
00:33:12.200 --> 00:33:14.360
<v Speaker 6>viewer as well to kind of know that, oh my god,

565
00:33:14.360 --> 00:33:17.600
<v Speaker 6>I missed this movie. This movie changed my life. And

566
00:33:17.640 --> 00:33:19.040
<v Speaker 6>maybe that was because of the Oscars.

567
00:33:19.440 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 4>But Yalitza, we still haven't seen a second movie from her.

568
00:33:22.440 --> 00:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Ah there you go, right, you know, but she's on

569
00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the cover of Vogue, but she's working on one. Yeah.

570
00:33:28.760 --> 00:33:31.880
<v Speaker 4>No, listen, it's not enough. It's not enough. The power

571
00:33:32.000 --> 00:33:34.240
<v Speaker 4>is shifting. And as much as I to have loved

572
00:33:34.280 --> 00:33:36.440
<v Speaker 4>the Oscars, I think it would be okay if they

573
00:33:36.800 --> 00:33:39.240
<v Speaker 4>were some other places. They don't exist yet, I don't think,

574
00:33:39.600 --> 00:33:41.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think there is a power in them being

575
00:33:42.640 --> 00:33:45.200
<v Speaker 4>broad and multicultural. Like I think there's certainly a place

576
00:33:45.200 --> 00:33:48.880
<v Speaker 4>where Latinos and the Latino Entertainment Journalists Association has their

577
00:33:48.920 --> 00:33:49.720
<v Speaker 4>own awards, so you can.

578
00:33:49.720 --> 00:33:50.320
<v Speaker 6>Check those out.

579
00:33:50.800 --> 00:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>But I feel like as much as movies have been

580
00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:58.280
<v Speaker 4>highlighted as this sort of pinnacle of American art, there's

581
00:33:58.320 --> 00:34:00.640
<v Speaker 4>other stuff now right, Like TV has a lot of

582
00:34:00.680 --> 00:34:03.400
<v Speaker 4>really great stuff and maybe a less elitist of an

583
00:34:03.400 --> 00:34:05.080
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure around criticism.

584
00:34:05.280 --> 00:34:06.680
<v Speaker 3>There's like web videos.

585
00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:08.960
<v Speaker 4>There's all sorts of other types of art that are

586
00:34:08.960 --> 00:34:11.400
<v Speaker 4>coming out. And as much as I love the movies

587
00:34:11.400 --> 00:34:14.360
<v Speaker 4>and I love the oscars, maybe it's okay that it

588
00:34:14.360 --> 00:34:16.919
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have the same cultural cachet and that my kids

589
00:34:16.920 --> 00:34:18.680
<v Speaker 4>are not going to care about it, and that they

590
00:34:18.680 --> 00:34:21.239
<v Speaker 4>will instead be looking at like the Netflix Top ten

591
00:34:21.280 --> 00:34:24.800
<v Speaker 4>lists or whatever, that there'll be other ways of measuring things.

592
00:34:25.280 --> 00:34:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't see that as a sadness or a loss,

593
00:34:27.960 --> 00:34:31.360
<v Speaker 4>but rather as an evolution and an opportunity. Like I

594
00:34:31.360 --> 00:34:33.600
<v Speaker 4>think it would be okay for it not to be

595
00:34:33.719 --> 00:34:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the cultural juggernaut it has been, but I'll still be

596
00:34:36.640 --> 00:34:37.160
<v Speaker 4>watching too.

597
00:34:38.680 --> 00:34:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, Hey, I'm happy. I'm feeling a lot better about

598
00:34:41.239 --> 00:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the whole situation after speaking with the three of you.

599
00:34:44.000 --> 00:34:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Before we wrap up, just a quick question, is there

600
00:34:46.520 --> 00:34:51.920
<v Speaker 3>something some person a film, an actor, director, editor, Latino

601
00:34:52.040 --> 00:34:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Latina that you just want to celebrate, that you just

602
00:34:54.960 --> 00:34:57.239
<v Speaker 3>want to give a shout out that maybe was or

603
00:34:57.360 --> 00:35:00.440
<v Speaker 3>was not in the Oscars this year, and start with

604
00:35:00.480 --> 00:35:00.920
<v Speaker 3>you Clayton.

605
00:35:01.440 --> 00:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yeah, I made a whole list about it right

606
00:35:03.600 --> 00:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>before voting started because I was trying to make sure

607
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone knew about them. David Alvarez and Westside Storry, Clifton

608
00:35:09.760 --> 00:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Collins Junior and Jockey.

609
00:35:12.920 --> 00:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I forgot a good couple of years left in Mate, Robin.

610
00:35:16.360 --> 00:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Da Hazeus and TikTok Boom was incredible, pounds of Nisio

611
00:35:22.320 --> 00:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>del Toro was great in the French dispatch.

612
00:35:24.880 --> 00:35:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Feelings in my heart.

613
00:35:27.400 --> 00:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't happell Coleman, Domingo and Zola respect so I.

614
00:35:32.560 --> 00:35:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Can go home there.

615
00:35:33.600 --> 00:35:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Nah, I'm gonna need you to do last.

616
00:35:37.640 --> 00:35:39.560
<v Speaker 2>My god, there was just like a lot this year.

617
00:35:39.840 --> 00:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And I always say there's people we don't know that

618
00:35:42.280 --> 00:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are Latino that are making strides, like Phil Lord from

619
00:35:46.040 --> 00:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell's in the Machines. It's Cuban like we had to

620
00:35:48.320 --> 00:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>celebrate him. That's like super dope. Oh it's shout out.

621
00:35:51.280 --> 00:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Cheris Castro Smith, who's a co director of Encanto, but

622
00:35:55.160 --> 00:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>based on rules of the Academy, co directors cannot be

623
00:35:57.840 --> 00:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>nominated only directors, so she doesn't have an Oscar nomination.

624
00:36:01.239 --> 00:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>But she wrote encanto and we feel that in every

625
00:36:04.400 --> 00:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>frame of that.

626
00:36:05.200 --> 00:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Jack, Latinos and Latinas, you want to celebrate.

627
00:36:08.320 --> 00:36:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Mariana Hosa for In the Heights best supporting actress,

628
00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, thank you.

629
00:36:14.400 --> 00:36:15.359
<v Speaker 2>He needs a shout out.

630
00:36:16.840 --> 00:36:19.719
<v Speaker 6>I think a few other ones that I whose performance

631
00:36:19.719 --> 00:36:23.120
<v Speaker 6>I really enjoyed this year was Oscar Isaac in the

632
00:36:23.160 --> 00:36:23.680
<v Speaker 6>Car Counter.

633
00:36:23.880 --> 00:36:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I was an American kid. Confinement of any kind was

634
00:36:28.000 --> 00:36:28.719
<v Speaker 3>terrifying me.

635
00:36:29.160 --> 00:36:32.520
<v Speaker 6>I think that few people have seen that performance, and

636
00:36:32.560 --> 00:36:35.160
<v Speaker 6>it's one of his best performances. I love al Heno

637
00:36:35.200 --> 00:36:36.120
<v Speaker 6>that are best in coda.

638
00:36:36.320 --> 00:36:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Remember the little Dog, Big Dog exercise. Okay, little Dog.

639
00:36:41.719 --> 00:36:44.840
<v Speaker 6>I thought he was fantastic. He was the fire of

640
00:36:44.880 --> 00:36:49.560
<v Speaker 6>that film. And Olga Meddicent in the Heights were yours?

641
00:36:50.080 --> 00:36:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Try my mother's old recipe one kind of condensed meal.

642
00:36:53.640 --> 00:36:56.520
<v Speaker 6>There was a campaign for her from the very get

643
00:36:56.520 --> 00:37:00.440
<v Speaker 6>go that went sideways. I think these are cheap people

644
00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:03.640
<v Speaker 6>who should have been nominated, who should have been considered,

645
00:37:03.640 --> 00:37:06.520
<v Speaker 6>who should still be a part of the Oscar talk

646
00:37:06.680 --> 00:37:09.160
<v Speaker 6>and buzz, And hopefully we'll see more of them, you know,

647
00:37:09.200 --> 00:37:10.160
<v Speaker 6>in the next couple of years.

648
00:37:10.480 --> 00:37:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Love that Christina I would certainly echo Charis Castro Smith.

649
00:37:14.800 --> 00:37:19.000
<v Speaker 4>She is the Latina Latino LATINX representation on the top

650
00:37:19.080 --> 00:37:22.720
<v Speaker 4>billing creative team of Incanto, so it feels very silly

651
00:37:22.760 --> 00:37:26.120
<v Speaker 4>that she wasn't nominated. And I would also say, you know,

652
00:37:26.160 --> 00:37:28.720
<v Speaker 4>you think of Tessa Thompson in Passing.

653
00:37:28.480 --> 00:37:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Just played exoticism an interesting what's different kind of emotional excitement.

654
00:37:34.680 --> 00:37:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was one of the most interesting innovative

655
00:37:37.960 --> 00:37:42.480
<v Speaker 4>films I watched this year, and it just completely got overlooked.

656
00:37:42.800 --> 00:37:44.319
<v Speaker 4>And I can't help but think that has to do

657
00:37:44.360 --> 00:37:48.160
<v Speaker 4>with race and gender and how deep its thoughts were

658
00:37:48.239 --> 00:37:52.880
<v Speaker 4>on those issues and maybe over some folks' heads, to

659
00:37:52.960 --> 00:37:56.480
<v Speaker 4>put it gently, and so not to see her in

660
00:37:56.560 --> 00:38:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that film nominated just feels like we are making great art,

661
00:38:01.320 --> 00:38:03.480
<v Speaker 4>but it is maybe not understood by the people who

662
00:38:03.520 --> 00:38:06.239
<v Speaker 4>are making all of the decisions, and that's where we

663
00:38:06.280 --> 00:38:07.319
<v Speaker 4>need to keep pushing on.

664
00:38:10.520 --> 00:38:13.479
<v Speaker 3>So, Cristina Jack Clayton, thank you so much for having

665
00:38:13.480 --> 00:38:16.200
<v Speaker 3>this great conversation with me on Latino USA. Grascia.

666
00:38:16.320 --> 00:38:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me. Thank you.

667
00:38:28.920 --> 00:38:32.200
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Alejandra Salasad and edited by

668
00:38:32.320 --> 00:38:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Marta Martinez and mixed by Leo Shawl Dameran. The Latino

669
00:38:36.120 --> 00:38:40.840
<v Speaker 3>USA team includes Andrea Lopez Grusado, Daisy Contreras, Mike Sargent,

670
00:38:40.960 --> 00:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Julieta Martinelli, Victoria Strada, Rinaldo Leanos Junior, Patricia Sulbaran and

671
00:38:46.560 --> 00:38:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Julia Rocha, with help from Raoul Perez. Our editorial director

672
00:38:50.400 --> 00:38:54.200
<v Speaker 3>is Julio Ricardo Barella. Our director of Engineering is Stephanie Lebou.

673
00:38:54.360 --> 00:38:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Our senior engineer is Julia Caruso. Our associate engineers are

674
00:38:57.920 --> 00:39:01.480
<v Speaker 3>gabriel A Bias and JJ Carubin. Our digital editor is

675
00:39:01.560 --> 00:39:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Luis Luna. Our fellows are Elisa Raina, Monica Morales and

676
00:39:05.480 --> 00:39:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Vignalis. Our theme music was composed by Sana Robindos.

677
00:39:09.719 --> 00:39:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm your host and executive producer marieo Hosa. Join us

678
00:39:12.480 --> 00:39:14.680
<v Speaker 3>again on our next episode and in the meantime, I'll

679
00:39:14.719 --> 00:39:19.160
<v Speaker 3>see you on all of our social media at Gerda Shao.

680
00:39:23.680 --> 00:39:28.280
<v Speaker 5>Latino USA is made possible in part by California Endowment

681
00:39:28.600 --> 00:39:31.920
<v Speaker 5>building a strong state by improving the health of all Californians,

682
00:39:32.280 --> 00:39:36.319
<v Speaker 5>the John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the

683
00:39:36.400 --> 00:39:42.799
<v Speaker 5>Heising Simons Foundation. Unlocking knowledge, opportunity and possibilities more at

684
00:39:43.040 --> 00:39:44.759
<v Speaker 5>Hsfoundation dot org.

685
00:39:48.840 --> 00:39:50.759
<v Speaker 3>I saw you all on the zoom, and y'all are

686
00:39:50.800 --> 00:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>looking adorable. I have a nine week old puppy, so

687
00:39:54.040 --> 00:39:56.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm not looking so cute right now. Yeah, nobody told

688
00:39:56.880 --> 00:39:59.160
<v Speaker 3>me that it's like when you have a newborn you

689
00:39:59.200 --> 00:40:02.359
<v Speaker 3>don't sleep. I knew about the hard part during the day.

690
00:40:02.440 --> 00:40:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh, hard work during the day, But

691
00:40:04.160 --> 00:40:05.759
<v Speaker 3>nobody said, yeah, you don't sleep at night.